JellyReviews Editorial

Accessibility Statement

Our commitment to an inclusive reading experience

Last updated: August 17, 2026

JellyReviews Editorial is committed to making our Site accessible to all readers, including those with disabilities. This statement describes the accessibility features of jellyreviews.com and our roadmap for improvement.

01Our commitment

We aim to conform to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA across the Site. WCAG is the international standard for web accessibility, and Level AA is the target required by most accessibility regulations worldwide, including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the European Accessibility Act.

That is a target, not a certification. Nobody has audited this Site against WCAG, and no user of assistive technology has been paid to review it. If something here is unusable for you, tell us and we will fix it. That is a promise we can keep.

02Features we have implemented

Semantic HTML: All pages use proper heading hierarchy, landmark regions (header, nav, main, footer), and semantic elements so screen readers can navigate the document structure.

Keyboard navigation: All interactive elements (links, buttons, form fields, accordion toggles, modal dialogs) are reachable and operable using the keyboard alone. Focus indicators are visible.

Color contrast: body text is dark ink on cream and measures above 17:1, well clear of the 4.5:1 that AA asks for normal text. One colour does not clear it. The rust used for links, hovered navigation and the wordmark measures 3.55:1 on cream, which is enough for large text, where AA sets the bar at 3:1, and short of the 4.5:1 required at body size. That is a deliberate brand decision, it is a real limitation, and it is named here rather than left for you to find.

Alt text: blog images carry alternative text written by hand for the photograph. Product photographs are described from the brand and product name they sit under, which tells you which product it is but does not describe the picture. Closing that gap is the first item on the roadmap below. Decorative images are marked so a screen reader skips them.

ARIA labels: Interactive elements that are not natively semantic (such as icon-only buttons) include ARIA labels.

Resizable text: The Site remains usable when text is scaled up to 200% in mainstream browsers.

Reduced motion: We respect the prefers-reduced-motion media query. Readers who have reduced motion enabled will see minimal animations.

03Known limitations

Despite our best efforts, some content may not be fully accessible. Known limitations include: (a) some product images supplied by merchants may not include adequate alt text, we are working with our affiliate partners to improve this; (b) the categories mega-menu requires hover on desktop, but is fully accessible via tap on touch devices and via keyboard on all devices; (c) third-party embedded content (such as video players or social widgets) is outside our direct control and may not meet our accessibility standards.

04Browser and assistive technology support

Pages are checked in Chrome and Edge on Windows, at desktop and phone widths, with the reduced-motion setting exercised at both. Keyboard focus order has been walked on the page templates rather than on every page. A screen reader has not been part of that check, and neither has macOS, iOS or Android. If you use a browser or an assistive technology we have not reached and something breaks, tell us and we will fix it.

05Feedback and contact

If you encounter an accessibility barrier on the Site, email support@jellyreviews.com with a description of the issue and the page URL. One person reads that mailbox, so no response time is promised here, but a barrier you can reproduce gets fixed.

If you would like to request an accommodation, such as an alternative format of a review or a transcript of video content, we will do our best to provide it.

06Roadmap

This section used to carry three dated commitments for 2026. None of them happened, and a schedule nobody is staffed to meet is worse than no schedule. What is next, in order, with no date attached: alternative text on product photographs that describes the photograph rather than the product it sits under, and a screen reader pass over the review page template.

Accessibility issues?
support@jellyreviews.com